Automated Ontology Construction: Potential for Failure or Success

Neuro-Symbolic AI with Ontology

Despite the dramatic advances in LLM and deep learning, modern AI still faces an ‘epistemological crisis’ of hallucination and explainability. This is because the current approach, which relies solely on statistical patterns (correlations) in data, struggles to handle complex business decisions and clear causal reasoning.

This article proposes ‘Ontology’ and ‘Knowledge Graphs’ as solutions, providing an in-depth analysis of how ontology construction—once a labor-intensive failure case—is now being ‘automated’ through integration with the latest LLM technology and Neuro-Symbolic architecture.

It details the evolution toward ‘System 2 Thinking’ AI—capable of logical verification beyond probabilistic guesswork—and ‘Semantic Integration’ that transcends the physical integration limitations of data lakes. It presents concrete technical solutions and future strategies for those seeking to ensure AI reliability and transparency while building truly data-driven intelligent agents.

Improve Agentic AI Performance Through Understanding Big O

Currently, the development of Agentic AI technology is overly focused on implementing functions that can operate in large-scale hardware infrastructure environments. A structural review is necessary to ensure that organizations can guarantee performance at a level that is actually usable when building Agent services internally.
Big O notation is a mathematical notation used to describe the performance of algorithms. Specifically, it predicts the performance of algorithms and architectures in terms of time complexity and space complexity. This review process is essential during system design.